Thursday, April 12, 2012

Breezy (2 stars)



Breezy, an R-rated film from 1973, is a May-December romantic drama starringWilliam Holden and Kay Lenz.  One of the earliest directorial works of Clint Eastwood, this film was one I recently watched for the first time for my William Holden viewing month.  While I rarely watch post-1965 (or R-rated) films, with my desire to see all the works of my #1 guy, I decided to take a chance on this one---and my decision to pretty much avoid those kinds of films was reconfirmed.




After a night of passion with a young man named Bruno, kind-hearted, guitar-playing "hippie" teenager, Edith "Breezy" Breezerman" (Kay Lenz), hitches a ride into the valley with a middle-aged man.  Frightened by the things the man has said to her, Breezy dashes from his car, while at a stoplight, and races away from him---and right into the life of another middle aged man---divorced real estate agent, Frank Harmon (William Holden).  Although Frank tells her he doesn't pick up hitchhikers, Breezy climbs into his car anyway and proceeds to chatter non-stop as they make their way to town.  Frank, a loner who enjoys his privacy, finds Breezy rather a nuisance, but seeing something in him she likes and trusts, Breezy isn't put off by his initial coldness.

Having left her guitar in the backseat of Frank's car, Breezy makes a visit to his house to pick it up, and though Frank is rude and somewhat unkind, Breezy's warmhearted nature begins to charm him---he feeds her, allows her to use his luxurious walk-in shower, and, at her request, provides her with her first-ever view of the Pacific Ocean.  Before long, Breezy is in love with Frank and has moved in to one of the guestrooms of his home.





Returning home from a party one night, Frank discovers Breezy waiting for him in his bed, asking him to make love with her.  As the two of them embark on a sexual relationship, Frank begins to struggle with the age difference between them---he is mistaken as her father when he takes her clothes shopping, and he is highly embarrassed when he takes Breezy to a movie (Clint Eastwood's High Plains Drifter, no less!) and runs into friends at the theatre.  Telling his friend he feels like a child molester, Frank determines that the best thing to do is break things off with Breezy.  How it all plays out is the balance of the film.





Breezy was a total turn-off to me for a number of reasons.  First and foremost---the nudity.  While such a view is out of sync with most movie-goers nowadays, I am unashamed to admit that I don't prefer nudity in the movies I watch.  I find it completely unnecessary.  Especially when you consider that earlier decades gave us passionate---even sensual---films, and they did so without nudity or graphic sex, you realize that those things are SO unnecessary to make a point.  (A Place in the Sun, From Here to Eternity, and Picnic being just a few examples of that.)  Sadly, as society's moral standards changed through the 60's and into the 70's, Hollywood's offerings reflected that change, and while a decade earlier, things would have been left to the imagination, by the time Breezy was made, nudity was not only accepted, but expected as well; here in Breezy, there were three or four nude scenes (female), all of which could have been left out.  Instead of adding to the romance or passion, those scenes only made the film trashy to me.

Another turn-off for me was the Holden/Lenz romance.  While I have no problems with May-December romance and even really love other May-December romance movies (Middle of the Night and Ten North Frederick being among my ten favorite movies), this particular older man/younger woman romance was quite unappealing to me.  Breezy was filmed in late 1972, when my beloved Bill was 54 years old; however, much as it pains me to say it since I completely adore this man, he looked to be about ten years older than that.  On the other hand, Kay Lenz, though 19 here, looked much younger...perhaps 15.   For me, a 15 year old girl and a 65 year old man is pushing the envelope, so I just didn't find myself rooting for them.  While he was thought to be her father in one scene, quite honestly, he looked more like her grandfather.  (This film was released when I was 12 years old; even if I had been allowed to see an R-rated movie at that age, I can assure you, I would have been "grossed out" by this relationship.)

Finally, I'm not a fan of "hippie" movies.  I quite hate that time period and the things which go with it.  To be honest,  William Holden---and my desire to see all of his films---is the only reason I chose to watch Breezy.  Had another man had the lead part, I would never have given it even a minute of my time, and it is only my love for Mr. Holden which keeps this film at 2 stars rather than 1. (Mostly because I feel, nudity aside, this film had to be a rather bold and courageous career move for him, and I am rewarding him for that.)

Since I want to have something positive to say about this film, I will acknowledge that the acting of both William Holden and Kay Lenz was very good (as is always the case for Mr. Holden).  Miss Lenz also consistently offered an incredibly bright and beautiful smile. Clint Eastwood's direction was very good, and although I found the love scenes a turn-off and even fast-forwarded through them, they appeared to be filmed well.  William Holden's son, Scott, makes an appearance in the film...as the veterinarian.  Father and son shared a scene together.

Oh, there were two occasions I found myself laughing hysterically.  First, Breezy has just told Frank that smoking was worse for someone his age than for someone younger.  Right after that, she asks him if he is married.  His response, "No.  There's very little call these days for old, decrepit, one-foot-in-the-grave smokers."  Later, she asked him if he thought God was dead, and he responded, "I didn't even know he was sick."  For some reason, those two exchanges quite hit my funny bone, and I giggled hysterically.

Bottom-line---because of the excessive and unnecessary nudity and the early 70's attitude towards free and easy sex, Breezy is not a film I feel comfortable recommending.  However, should you desire to watch it, the film is out on DVD, plus it is available through Net Flix instant viewing.

17 comments:

  1. Well, I think I shall pass on this one Patti! I also don't care for that era of movies and that does sound like a little too extreme of an age gap. Thanks for the review, you always do a wonderful job:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know me, Victoria, I really don't like to say anything negative...especially when it comes to my "beloveds." I prefer to say nothing at all rather than something negative. And I am probably very much walking to the beat of my own drum on this one, so you never know, you could well enjoy it.

      Delete
    2. We have a channel on our cable which shows quite a lot of older films, commercial free and nothing cut out. I noticed this was on the other day so since there was nothing else on I gave it a go. Yeah, I'm totally with you on the 2 star, almost a 1 star, if not for William Holden being in it. I was grossed out by their relationship and found it very shallow. Breezy had no depth at all, she sounded like a curious grand-daughter asking her grandpa questions through out the whole movie to me! I did stick it out because, like I mentioned, there was nothing else on but no way would I ever do a re-watch!

      Delete
  2. I loved this film. Instead of being lovers, I wished that he would have adopted her as his daughter. But.. I guess that would have been another movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I might have quite enjoyed this film had he adopted her as his daughter. But that would have changed the whole premise of the movie for sure!!! It's so funny, I LOVE "Middle of the Night," and the age difference between Fredric March's and Kim Novak's characters was about 30 years; however, she was in her 20's, so I suppose that is why it didn't seem out of line to me.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Dawn, it would have come across much better as a father/daughter film. There was a creepy, disturbing element to their relationship.

      Delete
  3. I loved this film too, but I don't find that WH looked so much older in this movie. I think because I like him so much in Wild Bunch, that I'm used to his older look and would have fallen for him easily when I was 18 (okay, I had already fallen for him long before I was 18, but that's not the point! LOL!). I totally understand and appreciate your objections though, and could do without nudity etc., myself. That and swearing... really unnecessary when so much can be conveyed without them.

    The two exchanges you mention also crack me up!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's interesting the things each of us can abide in a movie and what we cannot. Violence doesn't bother me at all, and I'm even okay with a fair amount of language. But for me, it's nudity and God's name in vain, and I just can't stand it.

      I do want to cultivate an appreciation for the 50+ Mr. Holden. After all, the aging process is inevitable!!

      Delete
  4. Also - after reading this post, do not be in ANY hurry to see The Wild Bunch, despite it having two of your favorite actors. I do not believe you will enjoy that film at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, it has nudity in it, but I definitely DO want to try that one again sometime. I don't throw out all films with nudity (case in point, "Titanic"). I just don't prefer for them to be a regular part of my viewing experience.

      Delete
  5. Hi, Patti!

    Stopping by and found your review fascinating! I was 19 in 1973. Don't remember this movie, but I do remember Kay Lenz. And that I thought she was so cute! I know, from reading your as-always fantastic descriptions and hearing your opinions, I wouldn't care for this one either. Of course, it's not surprising I feel the same as you about nudity. My age alone would give my ideas about this subject away. I'm watching American Idol and becoming furious we have to see J.Lo's videos. They are so inappropriate for that time slot. I always wonder what these actresses/singers/celebrities are going to tell/teach their children about their choice to be nude in a movie or song video or magazine. Breaks my heart that our children, unfortunately, have become unphased by it all. Seems like it's getting worse by the minute.

    Thanks, again, for all of your talent, hard work and time in sharing your love of classic movies (even when they're not so "classy!").

    ELC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ELC, thank you for your kind and complimentary words! I really appreciate that you enjoy my reviews.

      I have actually begged off from American Idol this year. The rest of my family watches it, but I do my own thing when it's on (usually watch a classic film on my laptop). Not sure why, but I just lost interest in it this year.

      The last couple years I have complained that the guys are always fully dressed, but most of the gals feel compelled to let it all hang out!! I read an article about that very thing a few months ago. Women no longer aspire to be pretty...instead, they aspire to be "hot." And there IS a difference. Whereas in decades past, women covered themselves and let there be a mystery about them, now they just aspire to let everyone see it all.

      I posted that article on my other blog (which I am not currently writing on but have not deleted.) Here is a link to the article...which, interestingly, was written by a man!!

      http://pattiannsblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/pretty-versus-hot.html

      Delete
  6. I actually want to see this, I am intrigued.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elisa, I think it's on YouTube as well. I was having problems with my computer and couldn't get the YouTube video to copy and paste, but I think I recall seeing that the entire movie was on there. So, if you don't subscribe to Net Flix, try to catch it there.

      Delete
  7. I'm definitely interested in seeing this now as I have a slew of complexes that puts this up my alley lol. Holden's downward spiral in his looks pains me (it's up there with the decline of Marlon Brando) as booze really took a toll on his appearance and his life (allegedly I must say). It does make me chuckle that your views seem to be in line with the current MPAA, that violence in film is fine but nudity and sex are taboo. It's always interesting to juxtapose current films with classic films. Movies from the 60s and 70s though are a rare breed as they seemed to get away with the must stuff since the MPAA had not been as dominant as it is now. I'm rambling lol, awesome post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kristen, right there with you being pained about Mr. Holden's aging process. And, stupid as it sounds, when I say that, I feel like I am betraying him or hurting him. I love him no matter what he looks like, but it saddens me to see him in his 50+ years.

      Oh, and I ought to qualify the violence and language. While I tolerate language in a movie, I DO think it is totally unnecessary. They made perfectly realistic movies in the "golden era" without the use of trash talk. Though I can take the "f" word a few times in a film, it doesn't mean I like it. And I don't want a large amount of it...2 or 3 times in a film is more than enough!!

      And the Lord's name as a cuss word infuriates me!

      As for violence, I watch gangster and war films from the "golden era." The violence in those films (even pre-code) doesn't bother me, but I have to be honest and say that I haven't seen a current film of that genre in years. They might provide more blood and gore than I can stand.

      Delete
  8. I have not seen this film Patti but you've brought it to life for me. I wouldn't want to see it though, I hate that hippy era and find everything about it so dated and just yucky.
    Thank you so much for your visit dear Patti. I think of you often.
    Yes its 100 years today that the Titanic sank. The TV is full of it at the moment and I'm finding it all so sad. I'm glad you liked my picture.
    Take care and God bless you.
    June xxx

    ReplyDelete

There are many wonderful blogs out there in blogland---and so little time to read them all. Therefore, I am truly humbled that you took the time to not only stop by my little place in the blogosphere, but to share your thoughts as well. Thank you for visiting...and for commenting. I hope your visit here was enjoyable and that you will return again soon.